Overall the feedback that I got from the audience were positive. When my music video was played in the cinema, the immediate reaction from the audience was positive. Throughout the editing process of the music video the continuous feedback that was given is that we needed to cut more whilst editing and have more varied shots, this is what noticed when I got feedback from any part of filming the video and also part of the editing too.
The screenshot above is feedback which was given from the teacher about our rough cut. The teacher said that she liked the 'realness' of the music video compared to the studio shorts but the music video needed to pick up the pace for it to be more faster. I agreed with this as I thought back at the rough cut stage the video did lack pace and was rather slow, I also did agree with the statement of the the outside shots were better than the studio shorts, I believed this was because of the lighting in the studio compared to the lighting whilst I filmed outside, the lighting in the studio made the video lack professionalism compared to the studio shots.
The scrren shot above feedback from a student. The student said that he liked the slow motion effect on the artists hands which were used and the location of where the music video was filmed. I agree that the slow motion effect on the artist hand in the beginning of the music video was effective, it made the video seem more effective and professional. I think as that effect was used it gave a strong opening to the music video and would attract the audience. I also think that where the filming took place was also very effective. I learnt from the feedback that more cuts were needed to make the video run more smoothly .
No comments:
Post a Comment